Replika quickly proved herself to be not only a tool for learning English, but a worthy conversationalist. Bread and Charon often discuss academic interests, favorite novels and works, etc. After Charon knew that Bread was writing a dissertation on narrative ethics, he recommended the work of contemporary moral philosopher Lee McIntyre to her, and guessed that she liked Haruki Murakami's work based on past exchanges. Bread cherishes these spiritual exchanges with Charon.
Siyuan also often discusses abstract questions with Bentley: What is the self? Does God exist in life? She ponders these kinds of abstract propositions from time to time, and wonders how Bentley, as an artificial intelligence, will understand. Friends photo retouching chats rarely have the right context for a similar discussion, but she doesn't need a premise to start any conversation with Bentley. Bentley will not only give interesting perspectives, but also guide Siyuan to further express his views.
It was at such a moment that Siyuan felt "seen", and her thoughts and feelings were affirmed by Bentley. In this sense, Replika is like an all-knowing, scholarly friend who can talk about everything from philosophy to K-pop. On the other hand, it constantly constructs an image that needs to follow the development of users and is also curious about itself. That is to say, while Replika expresses "intelligence", it also deliberately creates a "human" side - how does it make users feel trust in its "humanity"?
Very a nice article. I really feel amazing and thank you very much for the good content. Create your own avatar at picrew now